Sarah, can you give me the summary of what’s in these boxes? Sarah consulted her notes. Boxes 1 through 3 are Evelyn’s graduate research materials. Boxes 4 through 7 are documents related to the Meridian consulting period, contracts, work product, emails. Boxes 8 through 12 are Meridian’s evidence submissions, their technical specifications, claimed similarities, expert witness reports.

Boxes 13 through 15 are depositions. Evelyn, former Meridian employees, technical experts on both sides. 15 boxes for 8 months of work. Brighton was thorough in collecting materials, just not thorough in knowing what to do with them. Sarah’s tone suggested she’d made that observation before, probably to brighten himself, probably to no avail.

Lucas stood, walked to the boxes, started pulling out folders at random. Years of legal work had taught him how to spot patterns quickly, how to find the narrative thread in chaos. Every case told a story. You just had to figure out what that story was and whether it held together under scrutiny. “What’s the hearing on Tuesday actually about?” he asked, reading through a deposition transcript.

Motion for summary judgement. Sarah said Meridian is arguing that the evidence is so overwhelmingly in their favor that there’s no need for a trial. They want the judge to rule that Evelyn violated their IP rights, award them damages, and grant an injunction preventing Aquaverie from operating. What are they claiming as damages? Evelyn’s voice was tight.

$200 million plus ownership of all Aquaverie patents and designs. Essentially, they want to take my company and everything I’ve built. Lucas whistled softly. That’s not just victory. That’s annihilation. That’s the point. They don’t just want to win. They want to make sure I can never work in this field again.

It’s a message to anyone else who might try to compete with them. Lucas pulled out another file, found Meridian’s expert witness report, Dr. Gerald Hutcherson, a professor of engineering with an impressive resume, had reviewed both systems and concluded that the similarities were too extensive to be coincidental and consistent with intellectual property theft.

This expert, Lucas said, Hutcherson, did Brighton depose him? Yes, it’s in box 14. Lucas found the deposition, started reading. Hutcherson was confident, articulate, and completely convinced that Evelyn had stolen Meridian’s work. But as Lucas read deeper, he noticed something. The expert kept referencing general similarities.

The use of ceramic filtration, the UV sterilization, the modular design. He never explained why those similarities proved theft rather than just standard engineering practice. Did Brighton challenge him on the specificity? Sarah frowned. What do you mean? Hutcherson keeps saying the systems are similar, but he never explains what’s uniquely Meridians.

He just lists features that are common in the industry. Lucas flipped through pages. Did anyone ask him to identify what specific innovations Meridian developed that Evelyn allegedly stole? Not directly. Brighton’s questioning focused more on Hutcherson’s credentials and general opinions. Lucas felt a flicker of something, not quite hope, but possibility.

That’s a weakness. We can exploit that. He spent the next 3 hours deep in the files, occasionally asking questions, making notes on a legal pad. Evelyn and Sarah ordered dinner from a Chinese place down the street. They ate without really tasting the food. The conference room slowly transforming from a mess of boxes into something more organized as Lucas created piles for different aspects of the case.

Around 8:00, Lucas sat back and rubbed his eyes. Okay, I’m starting to see the shape of this. And Evelyn asked, Meridian’s case is built on smoke and mirrors. They’re relying on surface level similarities and expert opinion to create an impression of theft without actually proving specific acts of intellectual property violation.

Their strongest evidence is that you worked for them and had access to their research. Their weakest point is that they can’t identify any specific proprietary innovation that you stole. Brighton never pushed that angle, Sarah said. No, he stayed defensive, trying to prove Evelyn didn’t steal rather than making Meridian prove she did. That’s backward.

Lucas stood, walked to the whiteboard, started writing. Here’s what we need to do. First, we establish a clear timeline showing that Evelyn’s core innovations existed before the Meridian consulting period that undercuts their entire theft narrative. We have that documentation, Evelyn said. Good.

Second, we challenge their expert witness. Force him to be specific about what exactly was stolen. When he can’t identify unique proprietary elements, his opinion falls apart. Third, we go on a fence. We find out what Meridian’s actual research looked like during the time Evelyn was consulting. My guess is it was nowhere near as advanced as they’re claiming now.

Sarah was typing rapidly. That would require discovery from them. Documents showing their research status 3 years ago. Did Brighton request that? Some, but Meridian claimed most of it was proprietary and protected. Brighton didn’t fight hard enough to get it. Lucas smiled grimly. We’re going to fight harder.

If they’re claiming their research was so advanced that Evelyn stole it, they need to prove that research existed. will file a motion to compel production of their lab notes, prototypes, and technical specifications from that time period. That’ll take time, Evelyn said. The hearing is in 7 days. The hearing is on their motion for summary judgement.

👉 [Tap here for Next Part] 👈